Being the country that created the rules of engagement, and possibly the country
to first use Cyber Warfare as an official military tool would mark us as a
target much the same way being the fastest gun did in the Old West.
Hackers around the world will consider it an extraordinary triumph to be the
ones to use this weapon against the United States.
Another issue with unleashing worms and viruses intent on destroying the enemy
is that the possibility exists that with a few incorrect lines of programming
code the attack could spread world-wide instead of being contained to its
intended target.
A biological virus can mutate over time to be resistant to the antibodies created
to destroy it. It can get stronger and constantly find new ways to exploit flaws
in the human immune system.
Similarly, enemy nations and hackers around the world could intercept the code
from our cyber-attack once unleashed. They can analyze it, examine it, learn
from it and then rebuild it different, better and stronger than before and send
it back out. This happens already with everyday computer viruses.
While the ability to disable a nations infrastructure and cripple its military
defenses without firing a shot or launching a single cruise missile sounds
appealing, condoning and launching Cyber Warfare is a slippery slope we
may not want to start down. The United States should think very carefully
about the precedent they set and the repercussions of their actions before
choosing to unleash this new weapon.
To express your opinion on whether the U.S. should condone or use Cyber Warfare as a military weapon, click here to vote in the poll:
Cyber Warfare Poll
Start of Article > Cyber Warfare Directive > Page 1, 2